There have been mixed criticisms about Bitcoin, and there are several different perspectives on whether or not it could be the new currency. The arguments for and against Bitcoin’s replacement for conventional government-issued currencies will be examined in greater detail in this article.
Why Are Cryptocurrencies Not Considered Legal Tenders?
No government or central authority backs cryptocurrencies, so they are not considered legal tender. They can easily be used as a tool for illegal activities because they are not subject to the same regulations as traditional currencies. Moreover, their worth is profoundly unstable, making them a questionable store of significant worth.
How much Bitcoin do governments own?
Around 3 to 4% of all Bitcoin is owned by governments worldwide, according to estimates from September 2020. For instance, the US government holds approximately 144,336 BTC. Some people believe that the government’s involvement in Bitcoin is a sign of legitimacy, while others worry that it goes against the currency’s decentralized nature.
The investment in Bitcoin made by governments carries some risk. The asset’s worth is profoundly unpredictable, and states might lose much cash if they put resources into Bitcoin and its worth drops.
The Seizure of Bitcoin by Governments
Governments have taken a variety of measures to regulate Bitcoin. The US government, for instance, shut down the Silk Road marketplace in 2013 and seized 144,000 BTC. In 2013, the Chinese government outlawed the use of Bitcoin by its financial institutions, and in 2018, the Indian government announced plans to crack down on Bitcoin.
Law enforcement agencies frequently use blockchain analysis to track and seize crypto assets. These tools identify the addresses associated with a particular transaction. Governments can obtain customer information from exchanges and other businesses through subpoenas and court orders. Governments have directly seized individual crypto assets.
The Future of Bitcoin
Bitcoin’s future is a mystery. It has both advantages and disadvantages due to its decentralized design and lack of government oversight. Its anonymity also has the potential to facilitate illegal activities. Conversely, Bitcoin has the advantage of not being affected by inflation or government manipulation.
As legislatures get better at getting them, the crooks are also working on moving the assets around. Another famous method nowadays utilizes Blenders – individuals who pool together and blend assets from various sources and afterwards send them out indiscriminately to befuddle the source and objective of the assets. Blenders are moving around $50 million month to month by and large.
Legislatures don’t have a solution to demising these assets right now. There is such an excess of false movement that it turns out to be difficult to screen every last bit of it, the justification for why such a great deal it traverses government authorities.
In conclusion, it is still too early to determine whether Bitcoin will eventually replace government-issued currencies. However, the fact that more and more governments are making investments in it suggests that they are considering it seriously as a potential currency in the future.
Image Source: Adobe Stock
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
